Michael Ninh · SafeTrace
Research question · sanctions + entity resolution

Same tanker after a rename — or a different asset?

Names change. Stable identifiers do not. Would your screening workflow keep the asset connected?

20-second identity call → reveal → official source.
Your call~20 seconds

UK record: NS ARCTIC, IMO 9413547. Later EU record: AMULET, IMO 9413547. What is the safest assessment?

01 · Current assessment

Identity: strong. Current control: still unresolved.

Same physical assetProven

Changing names reconnect through stable IMO identifiers.

Sanctions connectionProven

Official UK/EU records identify the vessels using those IMOs.

Current owner / managerUnresolved

Dated historical records cannot be flattened into a timeless current state.

02 · Why

One stable key reconnects three names.

UK · 2024NS ARCTIC

Sanctions record.

→
EU · 2025AMULET

Same IMO in EU legal act.

→
Portal · 2026ALTAIR

Former name NS Arctic retained.

IMO 9413547 survives every rename.
Biggest open gap

Who owns and manages the vessel now? That requires fresh, time-stamped company/IMO records.

Best next move
Freeze the ownership graph “as of today”.

Compare fresh owner/manager records against the 2024 and 2025 states and preserve every change as a temporal edge.