Michael Ninh · investigation proof
Synthetic training case
Case 1 · Ownership

Who really owns Meridian Atlas?

Explore the network yourself. Open any relationship you want, decide what the evidence supports, then compare your call with the analyst conclusion.

Ownership network
Sources opened: 0 / 5

Click a percentage or relationship to inspect its source. The answer is deliberately hidden.

solid = establisheddashed = unknown
Natural personMihailo Petrović
UAE companyAurora Meridian FZE
UK companyNorthbridge Holdings Ltd
Target companyMeridian Atlas Trading GmbH
Natural-person principalUNKNOWN
Nominee companyCedar Nominees Ltd
Economic ownership ≠ automatic control
No source is mandatory. Research as much or as little as you think is enough.

What can you safely conclude?

Choose the statement you would put in an analyst memo.

Case 2 · Sanctions screening

Is this sanctions hit real?

The names look similar. Inspect the two identity records and decide whether they resolve to the same person.

Identity comparison
Sources opened: 0 / 2
Person in the company networkMihailo Petrović
Date of birth19 Apr 1984
NationalitySerbian
PassportRS-P884211
COMPARE
Sanctions-list recordMikhail Petrovich
Date of birth03 Jan 1972
NationalityRussian
PassportRU-72-441909
DOBdifferent
Nationalitydifferent
Passportdifferent
A name similarity is a lead, not a match.

Your call?

What would you do with this sanctions candidate?

Case 3 · Asset tracing

Who owns the warehouse?

Three organisations are connected to the same asset. Follow the relationship labels, inspect the underlying documents, then decide who legally owns it.

Asset relationship map
Sources opened: 0 / 3
CompanyAtlas Property SPV GmbH
CompanyMeridian Atlas
BankHelios Handelsbank
AssetLeipzig warehouse
Owner, operator and security holder are different legal roles.

Who legally owns the warehouse?

Choose the entity you would attribute the asset to.

✓
The deeper benchmark

Research first. Decide second. Show exactly why.

These three mini-cases sit on top of a larger 28-record synthetic investigation across five jurisdictions. The blind first pass scored 95/100 against hidden gold; a five-source research budget closed the remaining gaps to 100/100 with zero critical overclaims.

28source records
95 → 100blind → researched score
0critical overclaims
View technical proof ↗