Reusable agent gateway, capability gates, evidence requirements, human approval, traces and replayable failures. The public cases are synthetic and positioned as pilot-ready engineering candidates.
Try the bounded workflow → · Inspect repo ↗Turn repeated data requests into self-service.
A stakeholder asks the same question again. The workflow finds the required sources, joins the data, checks the answer and returns it with provenance — then turns the repeated request into a reusable check.
“Which campaigns need attention today?”
This is a synthetic UA-style case, not Almedia internal data. The mechanics are real and inspectable: separate JSON sources are loaded, joined by campaign ID and checked deterministically in the browser.
Flag campaigns below 1.0× ROAS or above €8 per verified user.
Normally this recurring question becomes another hand-off. Here the stakeholder gets a checked answer directly.
Self-service answer
This question is recurring. Turn the exact sources, joins, thresholds and failure policy into a reusable self-service check.
The revenue source is unavailable. The workflow does not guess a value or return a partial answer as complete.
Trust test: remove one required source and see whether the workflow still pretends it can answer.
Repeated question → reusable data product.
The goal is not merely to answer one request faster. It is to turn common, well-bounded questions into reliable self-service interfaces so the data team stops being the human API.
Real PDF intake, structured extraction, evidence states and persistence — another example of turning fragmented inputs into reviewable workflow state.
Try the document workflow → · Inspect repo ↗Start with the most repeated data request.
Build one self-service path in shadow mode first. Earn broader automation from evidence, not enthusiasm.